American Bee Journal - October 2019 Vol. 159 No. 10

Beekeeping Basics: The Queenless Conundrum

Tina Sebestyen 2019-09-09 10:50:23

Here is a common scenario … you open your colony expecting to see your new queen getting started after a split or supersedure, and you see … nothing; no eggs, no larvae, no hope. All of the capped brood has emerged, and the frames are bare except for the bees walking around on them. The beekeeper’s first impulse is to find a new queen, and get her here pronto.

But, do you really need a new queen? One of the best ways to find out is to ask the bees. The way to ask them is to give them a frame of open brood and eggs from another hive. If they need a queen, they will (usually) start raising one. If they do, you can assess the strength of the colony, time of year, and the amount of honey in the hive and decide whether to allow them to try raising another one, or to go ahead and buy a mated queen. Most often, after a colony fails to requeen, I choose to give them a mated queen, since losing two full brood cycles is tough on the ability of that colony to store enough honey and bee bread for winter, for one thing.

For another thing, a honey bee colony needs the full complement of pheromones in it. Installing a mated queen right after the frame of brood immediately restores the correct pheromone balance to the hive. Queen substance and brood pheromone are both required to keep the workers’ ovaries from developing. The longer either queen substance or brood pheromone is missing from the hive, the harder it will be to successfully introduce a new queen; the sooner after a failed queen-rearing event that the pheromone balance is restored, the better. That does not mean that buying a mated queen is always the best first response to queenlessness. If you have a colony that exhibits traits you appreciate, such as keeping mite counts low, good productivity, or frugal use of honey during winter, among others, raising your own new queen will result in the best quality queen.

Let’s review some facts and our bee math to determine when you need to worry about queenlessness. If you know when they lost their queen, you can calculate when you should see eggs and larvae from the new queen. One mistake many beekeepers make is to do their bee math using the minimum amounts of time for each step in the process, when, in reality, most of these events take the maximum amount of time estimated and often even more.

Bee math — estimated amounts of time for these steps:

Queen rearing from egg hatching to emergence 12½ days, 3-6 days to harden before she can fly, 1 day for orientation flights, 1-3 days to fly and mate, 3-6 more days before she begins to lay eggs. Minimum time from queenlessness to new eggs: 13 + 3 + 1 + 1 + 3 = 21 days. Maximum estimated time to new eggs: 13 + 6 + 1 + 3 + 6 = 29. That is a difference of one whole week, thus the usual answer to the question, “Do I need a new queen?” is, “Wait one more week.” I usually give them 5 full weeks from when they lost their queen, to get going, so I don’t have to look in every cell for that first egg.

The tricky part of this whole thing is that the colony could go to laying workers fairly soon after the 5 weeks are up, and sometimes even sooner. When queen substance, or a developing queen cell, and/or brood pheromone are missing from the hive, workers’ ovaries can develop, resulting in laying workers. This can be delayed by restoring at least brood pheromone to the hive. Worker bees emerge in 21 days, and drones emerge in 24 days, long before the 30 days that the queen needed to even start laying eggs. Adding open brood right before the queen is due to emerge gives us 21 more days with brood pheromone in the hive. The reason we add this frame before the queen emerges is that often when you open a colony with a young or virgin queen in it, the bees ball and kill her. Just to be safe, plan to leave the hive alone between the day the new queen emerges and until she has been laying eggs for at least a few days. The average for this is 11 days, but plan for a full two weeks.

Let’s go back to our broodless scenario … you introduce a frame with eggs and open larvae, and the bees don’t start raising a queen, does that definitely mean that they don’t need one? Unfortunately, no, they might still need one. The reason is that once workers’ ovaries begin to develop, and especially once they actually start laying eggs, they think they are the queens, and they don’t particularly want a new one. If you give a frame of eggs and open brood to a colony that already shows signs of laying workers — eggs on the sides or edges of cells, and multiple eggs in cells — the first thing that will happen is that they stop laying eggs. That first frame of open brood is needed to change their attitudes and hormones, and the pheromones of the hive. Then, after they are more receptive, you give them another frame of eggs and open brood, and they might start trying to raise a new queen. A mated queen would probably be better for the colony’s strength and survival, but if mated queens are not available, adding brood twice, or even three times, might be the answer to save your hive.

An even better answer might be to combine the laying worker hive with your queen-right colony. It has the right pheromones, and your confused bees can be productive in this new home. If you really want to keep your number of colonies the same, two weeks after combining, you can split a nuc out of your strong hive. I have spent plenty of time wrestling with laying worker colonies, trying to get them to accept a new queen. I have finally concluded that the best thing a beekeeper gets out of that is experience, and very often it is the experience of failure. One of the strong points of most beekeepers is that we don’t give up easily, and sometimes, not ever. Combining and then splitting is not giving up. It is taking the high road, giving the bees what they need to succeed, and not sacrificing the life of a nice, fat young queen for nothing.

I have heard beekeepers talk about just putting the box containing the laying workers on top of the queenright colony and everything working out all right. I have also heard of that process not working out so well. The method I use, as does the commercial beekeeper I work for, is the shake method. You take all of the frames out of the laying worker colony, and shake them out in front of one or more queen-right colonies. The bees walk right in to their new home and play nice. Now, I haven’t tried shaking a 16-frame colony out in front of a 5-frame nuc, and am not sure that would be wise.

If you only have the one colony, and are determined to save it, shaking the bees might be helpful anyway. I’ve tried shaking them out 100 yards away like the books say, and laying workers always return and get back to work. I have had success with installing a frame of brood, then a day or two later installing a caged and corked queen while shaking all of the bees out in front of their own hive so that they must walk in. It seems to change their attitudes.

The reason you leave the cork in is so that the bees cannot release her. Even if you don’t have laying workers, if the colony has been queenless long enough that all of the brood has emerged, they will need a long release. With the cork in place, you are in control of when the new queen is released. You can judge the colony’s readiness to accept her by running your finger down the screened queen cage. If the bees are at all difficult to move out of the way, it is because they are biting the screen. They are still trying to kill her. If they move out of the way easily, and come back to stick their tongues through to feed her without curling abdomens in the sting position, they are probably ready. Just to be sure, now you take the cork out and leave the candy plug in place, so that it takes them three more days. I know, the colony has been queenless a long time, and you are in a hurry to get them back in business. But, if you rush the process and they kill the queen, you haven’t succeeded in your goal. Take the time to give the bees what they need, and you can relax and have success.

There is one more job to do before letting the bees get started on the bee candy in the queen cage, and that is checking the colony for queen cells. The honey bee colony spreads queen substance throughout the hive mainly by touch, from the queen and then bee to bee. Since they can’t touch her very well inside the queen cage, they might start a new queen cell on the frame you gave them, even though they can kind of smell the new queen. Cut out all queen cells. The colony will never accept a new queen when they think they have their own on the way. Check the rest of the frames as well. Bees are eternally hopeful, and sometimes they try raising a new queen from one of their own unfertilized eggs. This is why sometimes you see queen cells in a colony that has no capped brood. Bee math again; since workers emerge after 21 days, and queens emerge in only 16, there will always be capped brood present until after the queen emerges. They aren’t trying to trick you, they are just being hopeful.

Here is the bottom line: if you find your colony apparently queenless, add a frame of open brood, wait three days and check it for queen cells and check for eggs in other frames. If no queen cell is started and you still can’t find eggs, add another frame of open brood and wait three more days. Nine times out of ten, you will find that you had a queen all along.

REFERENCES

Hoover, S.E., Keeling, C.I., Winston, M.L. et al. Naturwissenschaften (2003) Effect of Queen Pheromones on Worder Honey bee Development; 90: 477. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00114-003-0462-z

Seely, T.D. Queen Substance Dispersal by Messenger Workers in Honey Bee Colonies; Behav Ecol Sociobiol (1979) 5: 391. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292527

Conte, Y.L., Sreng, L., Sacher, N. et al. Chemoecology (1994) Chemical Recognition of Queen Cells by Honey Bee Workers 5: 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01259967

Mohammedi, A., Paris, A., Crauser, D. et al. Naturwissenschaften (1998) Effect of Oliphatic Esters on Ovary Development of Queenless Bees 85: 455. https://doi. org/10.1007/s001140050531

©American Bee Journal. View All Articles.

Beekeeping Basics: The Queenless Conundrum
https://americanbeejournal.mydigitalpublication.com/articles/beekeeping-basics-the-queenless-conundrum

Menu
  • Page View
  • Contents View
  • Advertisers
  • Website
  • Contact Us

Issue List

April 2026 Vol 166 No 04

March 2026 Vol 166 No 3

February 2026 Vol 166 No 2

January 2026 Vol 166 No 1

December 2025 Vol 165 No 12

November 2025 Vol 165 No 11

October 2025 Vol 165 No 10

September 2025 Vol 165 No 9

August 2025 Vol 165 No 8

July 2025 Vol 165 No 07

June 2025 Vol 165 No 06

May 2025 Vol 165 No 05

April 2025 Vol 165 No 4

March 2025 Vol 165 No 03

February 2025 Vol 165 No 02

January 2025 Vol 165 No 1

December 2024 Vol. 164 No. 12

November 2024 Vol. 164 No. 11

October 2024 Vol. 164 No. 10

September 2024 Vol. 164 No. 9

August 2024 Vol 164 No 8

July 2024 Vol 164 No 7

June 2024 Vol. 164 No. 6

May 2024 Vol. 164 No. 5

April 2024 Vol. 164 No. 4

March 2024 Vol 164 No 3

February 2024 Vol 164 No 2

January 2024 Vol 164 No 1

December 2023 Vol. 163 No. 12

November 2023 Vol 163 No 11

October 2023 Vol. 163 No. 10

September 2023 Vol. 163 No. 9

August 2023 Vol 163 No 8

JULY 2023 Vol 163 No 7

June 2023 Vol 163 No 6

May 2023 Vol 163 No 5

April 2023 Vol. 163 No. 4

March 2023 Vol. 163 No. 3

February 2023 Vol 163 No 2

January 2023 Vol. 163 No. 1

December 2022 Vol. 162 No. 12

November 2022 Vol. 162 No. 11

October 2022 Vol. 162 No. 10

September 2022 Vol. 162 No. 9

August 2022 Vol. 162 No. 8

July 2022 Vol. 162 No. 7

June 2022 Vol 162 No 6

May 2022 Vol 162 No 5

April 2022 Vol. 162 No. 4

March 2022 Vol 162 No 3

February 2022 Vol. 162 No. 2

January 2022 Vol 162 No 1

December 2021 Vol. 161 No. 12

November 2021 Vol. 161 No. 11

October 2021 Vol. 161 No. 10

September 2021 Vol. 161 No. 9

August 2021 Vol. 161 No. 8

July 2021 Vol 161 No 7

June 2021 Vol. 161 No. 6

May 2021 Vol 161 No 5

April 2021 Vol 161 No 4

March 2021 Vol 161 No 3

February 2021 Vol. 161 No. 2

January 2021 Vol. 161 No. 1

December 2020 Vol. 160 No. 12

November 2020 Vol. 160 No. 11

October 2020 Vol 160 No 10

September 2020 Vol. 160 No. 9

August 2020 Vol 160 No 8

July 2020 Vol. 160 No. 7

June 2020 Vol. 160 No. 6

May 2020 Vol 160 No 5

April 2020 Vol. 160 No. 4

March 2020 Vol. 160 No. 3

February 2020 Vol. 160 No. 2

January 2020 Vol. 160 No. 1

December 2019 Vol. 159 No. 12

November 2019 Vol. 156 No. 11

October 2019 Vol. 159 No. 10

September 2019 Vol. 159 No. 9

August 2019 Vol. 159 No. 8

July 2019 Vol. 159 No. 7

June 2019 Vol. 159 No. 6

May 2019 Vol. 159 No. 5

April 2019 Vol. 159 No. 4

March 2019 Vol. 159 No. 3

February 2019 Vol. 159 No. 2

January 2019 Vol. 159 No. 1

December 2018 Vol. 158 No. 12

November 2018 Vol. 158 No. 11

October 2018 Vol. 158 No. 10

September 2018 Vol. 158 No. 09

August 2018 Vol. 158 No. 8

July 2018 Vol. 158 No. 7

June 2018 Vol. 158 No. 6

May 2018 Vol. 158 No. 5

April 2018 Vol. 158 No. 4

March 2018 Vol. 158 No. 3

February 2018 Vol. 158 NO. 2

January 2018 Vol 158 No 2

December 2017 Vol. 157 No. 12

November 2017 Vol. 157 No. 11

October 2017 Vol. 157 No. 10

September 2017 Vol 157 No 9

August 2017 Vol. 157 No. 8

July 2017 Vol. 157 No. 7

June 2017 Vol. 157 No. 6

May 2017 Vol. 157 No. 5

April 2017 Vol. 157 No. 4

March 2017 Vol. 157 No. 3

February 2017 Vol. 157 No. 2

January 2017 Vol. 157 No. 1

December 2016 Vol. 156 No. 12

November 2016 Vol. 156 No. 11

October 2016 Vol. 156 No. 10

September 2016 Vol 156 No 9

August 2016 Vol 156 No 8

July 2016 Vol. 156 No. 7

June 2016 Vol. 156 No. 6

May 2016 Vol. 156 No. 5

April 2016 Vol. 156 No. 4

March 2016 Vol. 156 No. 3

February 2016 Vol. 156 No. 2

January 2016 Vol. 156 No. 1

December 2015 Vol. 155 No 12

November 2015 Vol. 155 No. 11

October 2015 Vol. 155 No. 10

September 2015 Vol. 155 No. 9

August 2015 Vol. 155 No. 8

July 2015 Vol. 155 No. 7

June 2015 Vol. 155 No. 6

May 2015 Vol. 155 No. 5

April 2015 Vol. 155 No. 4

March 2015 Vol. 155 No. 3

February 2015 Vol. 155 No. 2

January 2015 Vol. 155 No. 1

December 2014 Vol. 154 No. 12

November 2014 Vol. 154 No. 11

October 2014 Vol. 154 No. 10

September 2014 Vol. 154 No. 9

August 2014 Vol. 154 No. 8

July 2014 Vol. 154 No. 7

June 2014 Vol 154 No 6

May 2014 Vol. 154 No. 5

April 2014 Vol. 154 No. 4

March 2014 Vol. 154 No. 3

February 2014 Vol. 154 No. 2

January 2014 Vol. 154 No. 1

December 2013 Vol. 153 No. 12

November 2013 Vol. 153 No. 11

October 2013 Vol. 153 No. 10

September 2013 Vol 153 No 9

August 2013 Vol. 153 No. 8

July 2013 Vol. 153 No. 7

June 2013 Vol. 153 No. 6

May 2013 Vol. 153 No. 5

April 2013 Vol. 153 No. 4

March 2013 Vol. 153 No. 3

February 2013 Vol. 153 No. 2

January 2013 Vol. 153 No. 1

December 2012 Vol. 152 No. 12

November 2012 Vol. 152 No. 11

October 2012 Vol. 152 No. 10

September 2012 Vol. 152 No. 9

August 2012 Vol. 152 No. 8

July 2012 Vol. 152 No. 7

June 2012 Vol. 152 No. 6

May 2012 Vol. 152 No. 5

April 2012 Vol. 152 No. 4

March 2012 Vol. 152 No. 3

February 2012 Vol. 152 No. 2

January 2012 Vol. 152 No. 1

November 2011 Vol. 151 No. 11

October 2011 Vol. 151 No. 10

September 2011 Vol. 151 No. 9

August 2011 Vol. 151 No. 8

July 2011 Vol. 151 No. 7

June 2011 Vol. 151 No. 6

May 2011 Vol. 151 No. 5

April 2011 Vol. 151 No. 4

March 2011 Vol. 151 No. 3

February 2011 Vol. 151 No. 2

January 2011 Vol. 151 No. 1

December 2010 Vol. 150 No. 12

November 2010 Vol. 150 No. 11

October 2010 Vol. 150 No. 10

September 2010 Vol. 150 No. 9

August 2010 Vol. 150 No. 8

July 2010 Vol. 150 No. 7

June 2010 Vol. 150 No. 6

May 2010 Vol. 150 No. 5

April 2010 Vol. 150 No. 4

March 2010 Vol. 150 No. 3

February 2010 Vol. 150 No. 2

January 2010 Vol 150 No 1

December 2009 Vol. 149 No. 12

November 2009 Vol. 149 No. 11

October 2009 Vol. 149 No. 10

September 2009 Vol. 149 No. 9

August 2009 Vol. 149 No. 8

July 2009 Vol. 149 No. 7

June 2009 Vol. 149 No. 6

April 2009 Vol. 149 No. 4

March 2009 Vol 149 No. 3

February 2009 Vol. 149 No. 2

January 2009 Vol 149 No. 1


Library