American Bee Journal - October 2019 Vol. 159 No. 10

Beekeeping, Past and Present: Using Naturally Built Queen Cells

Wyatt A. Mangum 2019-09-09 11:14:29

Naturally-built, well-constructed queen cells from good bee breeding stock can be a source of new queens in a beekeeping operation. To use these queen cells, beekeepers should know to how judge good queen cells from poor ones, how to cut queen cells from combs, how to transport queen cells between apiaries, and how to reattach queen cells to the combs of the recipient colonies. With the high cost of queens, these skills would be very beneficial for beekeepers to produce some queens on their own.

As part of our general biology of queen cells, let’s briefly review some basic queen cell biology and beekeeper terminology. Queen cells occur naturally under three conditions: when bees prepare to swarm, to supersede a failing queen, or from emergency queen loss. Queen cells reared under these three conditions are referred to respectively as swarm cells, supersedure cells, and emergency queen cells. When swarming, bees build numerous swarm cells near the edge of the brood comb. There are plenty more swarm cells over the face of the comb, most likely in locations where queen cells will fit between the combs. In contrast, bees superseding their queen typically build a few queen cells near the central region of the combs. The two categories can be nebulous. A colony, typically in the spring, can start out with a few supersedure cells and later on use them to swarm.

Swarm or supersedure cells usually begin from queen cell cups. A queen cell cup is a precursor of a queen cell, consisting only of the cell’s base and about a third of the cell’s wall (see Figure 1). Queen cell cups are usually present in the brood nest for most of the active season; however, they are generally empty except during swarming and supersedure. When containing a fast-growing queen larva, the bees build the queen cell cup into a queen cell (see Figure 2). In contrast, if the queen dies suddenly, the bees are forced to begin the emergency queen cell by enlarging a worker cell containing a young larva. Unlike the queen cell structure in Figure 2, emergency queen cells have cavities extending to the original worker cell floor (the foundation). As we will see later, this deeply rooted cavity presents a difficulty when removing an emergency queen cell from the comb.

From egg to adult, the queen develops in about 16 days. Although the larva is female, the production of an adult queen or worker is determined by the larva’s diet. The diet for queen formation is commonly called royal jelly and differs from the larval diet of the worker bee larvae. When the nurse bees finish provisioning the queen cell with royal jelly, the bees build a wax dome-shaped cap across the cell’s opening. Now the cell is referred to as a “sealed” queen cell (see Figure 3). For about a day after her cell is sealed, the queen larva continues to feed on stored royal jelly, quite unlike the worker and drone larvae who do not have anything like this massive food reserve. Before transforming to a pupa, the queen larva spins a partial cocoon (concurrent with postcapping feeding). A queen cocoon is quite unusual because it does not completely surround the queen pupa. The cocoon extends across the cell’s cap and up the sides, but not across the base of the cell, which would separate the queen larva from her food supply (see Figure 4). Prior to the queen’s emergence, typically the bees will remove most of the wax cap and expose the end of the cocoon (see Figure 5). The presence of an exposed cocoon can be used to distinguish a queen cell that has been sealed for some time from a newly sealed cell (with a wax dome). Besides wanting some indication of when the queen will emerge, newly sealed queen cells should not be handled. Apparently the spinning larva is quite susceptible to temperature fluctuations and physical shocks. When the queen is ready to emerge from her cell, the queen cell is referred to as a “ripe” queen cell.

When learning about queen cells, we see them in one particular way, which is so obvious, it becomes subtle, and then beyond question. We see queen cells in reflected light. To better reveal the structure of queen cells, let’s look at queen cells in transmitted light, where the light comes out of the queen cell (transmitted through the cell). In Figure 6, I have removed the contents from a sealed queen cell, installed a small light source, and photographed the queen cell in the dark. Now the braided pattern becomes more pronounced. The random ridges of wax appear woven around the sides of the queen cell. The pits on the queen cell glow because their bottoms are just the queen’s cocoon and some thin wax. The cap end of the cell glows brightly because it is only the queen’s thin cocoon since the bees removed the wax cap (and my little light source had more light aimed to the cap. Currently, I’m looking for a better light source, subject to several technical parameters.) When the queen emerges, she has only to snip through the cocoon, not chew through a thick layer of capping wax as shown in the next revealing photograph.

Figure 7 shows a sealed queen cell that was recently capped, as indicated by its thick wax cap. Even the wax braids seem thick and heavy with no obvious pattern. In Figure 8, I am comparing my lighting technique on a pair of joined queen cells. The left queen cell is in regular reflected light as we see it in the usual way. On the right, the queen cell is in the same reflected light –– plus it emits transmitted light. The queen-cell pits on the left cell appear inconsequential and unimportant. The lighting of the right queen cell indicates the thinness of the bottoms of these pits. The glow from the pits helps one understand how worker bees and queen bees could put their antennae into the pits to determine if the queen inside is alive, and to perceive maybe even her age. The thin-bottom pits could be like “olfactory windows.”

While seeing the queen cell pits in transmitted light appears to be novel, the idea about bees using them to perceive queen cell contents has been around for a long time. In addition, I know a virgin queen can tell if a queen cell contains a live queen. Many times I have found her with several destroyed sealed queen cells and a couple others intact, appearing ready to emerge. Those queen cells are not viable. She knows it, and my rule is not to use those queen cells. I cannot remember the virgin queen ever being wrong, provided the bees did not interfere with her (so not during after-swarming because then the worker bees regulate queen emergence.) My humble rule is a queen can tell what is in a queen cell better than I can.

Whether the queen cells were built in response to swarming, supersedure, or emergency queen loss, only the best cells should be to produce new queens. The egg-laying capacity of these new queen bees will vary, in part, because of differences in their developmental environments. For example, queen larvae that received generous amounts of royal jelly grow larger, and as queens, are expected to have a larger egg-laying capacity. Some of the differences in the queen’s developmental environment show up in the size and the appearance of her queen cell. Therefore it is important to be able to distinguish good queen cells from others by their appearance.

Queen cells vary in size, and in judging queen cells, size is very important. Larger queen cells generally indicate a better developmental environment of the larva. Therefore, larger queen cells are better than smaller ones. For example, Figure 9 shows a size comparison between a small queen cell reared under emergency queen loss conditions and a large queen cell reared under supersedure conditions. If a queen cell that small is opened and the pupa is removed, very often, little or no excess (old) royal jelly remains in the cell. The lack of excess food can indicate that the former larva may not have been properly fed, and may result in a poor queen. In contrast, the larger queen cells typically during swarming or supersedure contain excess royal jelly, i.e., more royal jelly than the larvae could consume. Most likely these larvae were properly fed. By the time the queens emerge, the previously glistening white royal jelly will appear as a gooey reddish-brown substance at the base of the cell. Seeing that material in an old queen cell still indicates the queen larva was well fed. Now that we know about judging queen cells, the next step is moving them.

Although an entire frame with naturally- built queen cells can be transferred between colonies, usually it is more efficient to cut the queen cells from the combs of the donor colonies and attach them to the combs of the recipient colonies. Eventually this manipulation will be required because the queen cell donor frames will not match the number of receiving colonies. In addition, sometimes I must transport the queen cells to recipient colonies in another apiary. It is easier to move the queen cells in a small padded box near the heat vent of the truck, rather than move several frames and replace the frames in the donor colonies.

To begin, I move only sealed queen cells between colonies, because obviously the bees have finished provisioning a sealed queen cell with royal jelly. As mentioned above, I do not move newly sealed queen cells with spinning larvae. Seeing the fibrous cocoon at the end and sides of the queen cell tells me the queen cell can withstand some reasonable handling as described in the next article.

Unsealed queen cells, containing feeding larvae, should not be moved because the recipient colony is usually weaker, a nuc, or queenless, etc. The weak colony may not finish provisioning the queen cell with a generous amount of royal jelly. In addition, a queen cell with a larva is extremely delicate near its opening. Deform or dent the circular opening to the larva, and the bees may destroy the queen cell.

Removing a queen cell from the comb gets easy with a little practice. I use my pocketknife to cut, being careful not to expose the developing queen or to dent the cell. Queen cells constructed from queen cell cups are usually easier to remove from the comb than are emergency queen cells. As noted above, the cavity of an emergency queen cell originates in the floor of the worker cell (i.e., the foundation). In order to separate the emergency queen cell from the comb without exposing the developing queen, you must cut out a plug of the underlying comb. That is not only messy, but it can be quite difficult if one encounters reinforcing wires or plastic foundation. Therefore, I rarely use emergency queen cells in producing new queens. Of course one could resort to moving the entire frame with the emergency queen cells on it to queen-start a colony, perhaps choosing the best cell by eliminating the others.

In contrast, the cavities of queen cells built from queen cell cups only extend to the former queen cell cups, which are not very deep in the brood comb. In most situations, these queen cells only extend a little into the face of the brood comb, making their removal easy. The cutting also avoids foundation wires, which are deeper in the brood comb. So swarm and supersedure queen cells are usually well constructed and easy to cut from the brood comb as compared to emergency queen cells. I recommend beekeepers practice cutting queen cells from combs that would be otherwise destroyed, even removing unsealed ones, just to increase your skill level.

In the next article I will share more innovative things I do with queen cells that beekeepers should find useful with their apiary work, like transporting queen cells safely and reattaching them to the combs of the recipient colony. I am also going to share something rather novel that I have done for decades.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author thanks Suzanne Sumner for her comments on the manuscript. Visit TBHSbyWAM.com and BeeChildTheBook.com.

Dr. Wyatt Mangum, author of Top-Bar Hive Beekeeping: Wisdom and Pleasure Combined, is an internationally known top-bar hive beekeeper, who started keeping bees at age 10. He switched all his colonies to top-bar hives back in 1986, long before it became popular. He is also an apicultural historian, who blends his knowledge of beekeeping history with his study of honey bee behavior. email: wmangum @umw.edu. www.TBHSbyWAM.com

©American Bee Journal. View All Articles.

Beekeeping, Past and Present: Using Naturally Built Queen Cells
https://americanbeejournal.mydigitalpublication.com/articles/beekeeping-past-and-present-using-naturally-built-queen-cells

Menu
  • Page View
  • Contents View
  • Advertisers
  • Website
  • Contact Us

Issue List

April 2026 Vol 166 No 04

March 2026 Vol 166 No 3

February 2026 Vol 166 No 2

January 2026 Vol 166 No 1

December 2025 Vol 165 No 12

November 2025 Vol 165 No 11

October 2025 Vol 165 No 10

September 2025 Vol 165 No 9

August 2025 Vol 165 No 8

July 2025 Vol 165 No 07

June 2025 Vol 165 No 06

May 2025 Vol 165 No 05

April 2025 Vol 165 No 4

March 2025 Vol 165 No 03

February 2025 Vol 165 No 02

January 2025 Vol 165 No 1

December 2024 Vol. 164 No. 12

November 2024 Vol. 164 No. 11

October 2024 Vol. 164 No. 10

September 2024 Vol. 164 No. 9

August 2024 Vol 164 No 8

July 2024 Vol 164 No 7

June 2024 Vol. 164 No. 6

May 2024 Vol. 164 No. 5

April 2024 Vol. 164 No. 4

March 2024 Vol 164 No 3

February 2024 Vol 164 No 2

January 2024 Vol 164 No 1

December 2023 Vol. 163 No. 12

November 2023 Vol 163 No 11

October 2023 Vol. 163 No. 10

September 2023 Vol. 163 No. 9

August 2023 Vol 163 No 8

JULY 2023 Vol 163 No 7

June 2023 Vol 163 No 6

May 2023 Vol 163 No 5

April 2023 Vol. 163 No. 4

March 2023 Vol. 163 No. 3

February 2023 Vol 163 No 2

January 2023 Vol. 163 No. 1

December 2022 Vol. 162 No. 12

November 2022 Vol. 162 No. 11

October 2022 Vol. 162 No. 10

September 2022 Vol. 162 No. 9

August 2022 Vol. 162 No. 8

July 2022 Vol. 162 No. 7

June 2022 Vol 162 No 6

May 2022 Vol 162 No 5

April 2022 Vol. 162 No. 4

March 2022 Vol 162 No 3

February 2022 Vol. 162 No. 2

January 2022 Vol 162 No 1

December 2021 Vol. 161 No. 12

November 2021 Vol. 161 No. 11

October 2021 Vol. 161 No. 10

September 2021 Vol. 161 No. 9

August 2021 Vol. 161 No. 8

July 2021 Vol 161 No 7

June 2021 Vol. 161 No. 6

May 2021 Vol 161 No 5

April 2021 Vol 161 No 4

March 2021 Vol 161 No 3

February 2021 Vol. 161 No. 2

January 2021 Vol. 161 No. 1

December 2020 Vol. 160 No. 12

November 2020 Vol. 160 No. 11

October 2020 Vol 160 No 10

September 2020 Vol. 160 No. 9

August 2020 Vol 160 No 8

July 2020 Vol. 160 No. 7

June 2020 Vol. 160 No. 6

May 2020 Vol 160 No 5

April 2020 Vol. 160 No. 4

March 2020 Vol. 160 No. 3

February 2020 Vol. 160 No. 2

January 2020 Vol. 160 No. 1

December 2019 Vol. 159 No. 12

November 2019 Vol. 156 No. 11

October 2019 Vol. 159 No. 10

September 2019 Vol. 159 No. 9

August 2019 Vol. 159 No. 8

July 2019 Vol. 159 No. 7

June 2019 Vol. 159 No. 6

May 2019 Vol. 159 No. 5

April 2019 Vol. 159 No. 4

March 2019 Vol. 159 No. 3

February 2019 Vol. 159 No. 2

January 2019 Vol. 159 No. 1

December 2018 Vol. 158 No. 12

November 2018 Vol. 158 No. 11

October 2018 Vol. 158 No. 10

September 2018 Vol. 158 No. 09

August 2018 Vol. 158 No. 8

July 2018 Vol. 158 No. 7

June 2018 Vol. 158 No. 6

May 2018 Vol. 158 No. 5

April 2018 Vol. 158 No. 4

March 2018 Vol. 158 No. 3

February 2018 Vol. 158 NO. 2

January 2018 Vol 158 No 2

December 2017 Vol. 157 No. 12

November 2017 Vol. 157 No. 11

October 2017 Vol. 157 No. 10

September 2017 Vol 157 No 9

August 2017 Vol. 157 No. 8

July 2017 Vol. 157 No. 7

June 2017 Vol. 157 No. 6

May 2017 Vol. 157 No. 5

April 2017 Vol. 157 No. 4

March 2017 Vol. 157 No. 3

February 2017 Vol. 157 No. 2

January 2017 Vol. 157 No. 1

December 2016 Vol. 156 No. 12

November 2016 Vol. 156 No. 11

October 2016 Vol. 156 No. 10

September 2016 Vol 156 No 9

August 2016 Vol 156 No 8

July 2016 Vol. 156 No. 7

June 2016 Vol. 156 No. 6

May 2016 Vol. 156 No. 5

April 2016 Vol. 156 No. 4

March 2016 Vol. 156 No. 3

February 2016 Vol. 156 No. 2

January 2016 Vol. 156 No. 1

December 2015 Vol. 155 No 12

November 2015 Vol. 155 No. 11

October 2015 Vol. 155 No. 10

September 2015 Vol. 155 No. 9

August 2015 Vol. 155 No. 8

July 2015 Vol. 155 No. 7

June 2015 Vol. 155 No. 6

May 2015 Vol. 155 No. 5

April 2015 Vol. 155 No. 4

March 2015 Vol. 155 No. 3

February 2015 Vol. 155 No. 2

January 2015 Vol. 155 No. 1

December 2014 Vol. 154 No. 12

November 2014 Vol. 154 No. 11

October 2014 Vol. 154 No. 10

September 2014 Vol. 154 No. 9

August 2014 Vol. 154 No. 8

July 2014 Vol. 154 No. 7

June 2014 Vol 154 No 6

May 2014 Vol. 154 No. 5

April 2014 Vol. 154 No. 4

March 2014 Vol. 154 No. 3

February 2014 Vol. 154 No. 2

January 2014 Vol. 154 No. 1

December 2013 Vol. 153 No. 12

November 2013 Vol. 153 No. 11

October 2013 Vol. 153 No. 10

September 2013 Vol 153 No 9

August 2013 Vol. 153 No. 8

July 2013 Vol. 153 No. 7

June 2013 Vol. 153 No. 6

May 2013 Vol. 153 No. 5

April 2013 Vol. 153 No. 4

March 2013 Vol. 153 No. 3

February 2013 Vol. 153 No. 2

January 2013 Vol. 153 No. 1

December 2012 Vol. 152 No. 12

November 2012 Vol. 152 No. 11

October 2012 Vol. 152 No. 10

September 2012 Vol. 152 No. 9

August 2012 Vol. 152 No. 8

July 2012 Vol. 152 No. 7

June 2012 Vol. 152 No. 6

May 2012 Vol. 152 No. 5

April 2012 Vol. 152 No. 4

March 2012 Vol. 152 No. 3

February 2012 Vol. 152 No. 2

January 2012 Vol. 152 No. 1

November 2011 Vol. 151 No. 11

October 2011 Vol. 151 No. 10

September 2011 Vol. 151 No. 9

August 2011 Vol. 151 No. 8

July 2011 Vol. 151 No. 7

June 2011 Vol. 151 No. 6

May 2011 Vol. 151 No. 5

April 2011 Vol. 151 No. 4

March 2011 Vol. 151 No. 3

February 2011 Vol. 151 No. 2

January 2011 Vol. 151 No. 1

December 2010 Vol. 150 No. 12

November 2010 Vol. 150 No. 11

October 2010 Vol. 150 No. 10

September 2010 Vol. 150 No. 9

August 2010 Vol. 150 No. 8

July 2010 Vol. 150 No. 7

June 2010 Vol. 150 No. 6

May 2010 Vol. 150 No. 5

April 2010 Vol. 150 No. 4

March 2010 Vol. 150 No. 3

February 2010 Vol. 150 No. 2

January 2010 Vol 150 No 1

December 2009 Vol. 149 No. 12

November 2009 Vol. 149 No. 11

October 2009 Vol. 149 No. 10

September 2009 Vol. 149 No. 9

August 2009 Vol. 149 No. 8

July 2009 Vol. 149 No. 7

June 2009 Vol. 149 No. 6

April 2009 Vol. 149 No. 4

March 2009 Vol 149 No. 3

February 2009 Vol. 149 No. 2

January 2009 Vol 149 No. 1


Library