American Bee Journal - October 2016 Vol. 156 No. 10

Varroa Mite Monitoring—Using A Sugar Roll To Identify Populations Of Varroa Destructor In Honey Bee Colonies

Meghan Milbrath 2016-09-08 12:10:31

Step 1. Get all your materials ready.

Pick a hive, and make sure you have the following equipment, or your mite-check kit. To purchase a mite check kit, visit www.Pollinators.msu.edu/mite-check. Instructions to make your own sugar roll jar can be found at the Bee Informed Partnership website (https://beeinformed.org/2013/03/19/how-to-make-a-sugarroll-jar/).

♦ Powdered sugar

♦ ½ cup measuring cup marked at 100ml or 0.42 cups

♦ Container with white/light colored bottom

♦ Sugar roll jar (Jar with 1/8” hardware cloth lid)

♦ Water

♦ Rag (for cleaning the jar between tests)

♦ A buddy isn’t necessary, but a second pair of hands often helps.

Step 2. Find a frame of brood. Open the colony, and move down through the colony until you reach the brood nest. Not quite there in this photo!

Take the lid off of your jar, and make sure that all your test equipment is clean and dry.

Try to always select the same type of frame. This one (top right) has a lot of drone brood, so it may give us a different result. We try to choose a frame of brood with a mix of open larvae and capped brood.

This frame looks great – there is open larvae and capped brood, so we will get lots of nurse bees. Check it carefully to make sure that the queen is not on it!

Step 3. Get a 100ml (just under 1/2 cup) of bees. There are two ways to do this.

Method 1 - In the first method, you can knock the bees off the frame into your tub. Use one quick, hard shake (lots of little shakes will just annoy them – you want to go hard enough to startle them so they fall).

Thump the bees to a corner of the tub, and use your scoop to pick up your sample of bees and put in the jar.

Since you are using nurse bees, many can’t fly quickly, and aren’t as apt to sting. You’ll hear them buzz as they get confused, but this step doesn’t really make them mad.

You may have to thump / scoop more than once to make sure that you are getting the full sample of bees. You want to get as close to 100ml (0.42cups) as possible so that you can calculate an accurate count.

Method 2 - The second method of getting 300 bees involves slowly running the edge of the measuring cup along the frame, and letting the bees drop into the cup. This method is best used if the brood frame has some nectar on it. In the shaking method, the nectar can drip on the bees, making them sticky. In the method shown here, you want to be very careful that you are gently tripping the bees into the cup, and not rolling over their bodies. You can try moving the cup upwards or downwards – some people like different methods better than others. Like any skill this requires practice, so make sure you do this as often as you can so you can sample comfortably.

Once you have ½ cup of bees in the jar, put on the screened lid.

Step 4. Add powdered sugar. Add a heaping hive tool of powdered sugar through the screen (about 2 tbsp). Make sure that the powdered sugar coats all the bees. If the bees look damp or not fully covered, feel free to add more sugar.

Step 5. Roll. Roll the jar for one minute, making sure that the bees are sufficiently coated with sugar. Make sure that you don’t tip the jar upside down, and that all the mites stay in the jar until you can count them.

Step 6. Rest Set the jar in the shade for 2 minutes. While the bees are in the jar, they heat up, causing the mites to fall off. The powdered sugar prevents them from being able to crawl back onto the bees.

While you wait, you can put the colony back together.

Step 7. Shake. After 2 minutes are up, it is time to shake the mites into the tub. Shake the jar over for 1 minute, shaking hard enough that you dislodge any mites that are stuck to the sides of the jar or in between the bees. A common mistake is to not shake vigorously enough, so make sure you put some effort into it!

Once all the mites are in the tub, you can return the bees from the jar to the hive. They will be a bit worse for wear, but the other workers will quickly clean them up.

Step 8. Count mites. Add some water to the tub, dissolving the sugar so that you can see the mites.

Count and record the number of mites in the tub. A magnifying glass can be useful to see the mites, as they are quite small. Make sure that you are clear on what varroa mites look like. Here, the speck that is pointed out is a varroa mite. The similarly sized speck to the left, however, is not.

You will be looking for something that is cinnamon colored and a flattened round shape. They can be differentiated from other things in the bucket because they will have smooth edges.

Calculate the number of mites per 100 bees. Your sample contains about 300 bees, so you have to divide the number of mites in your tub by 3 to get percent infestation. This colony had only two mites, so the mites / 100 bees = 2/3.

Step 9. Compare your mite count to your threshold.

As of 2016, many experts are using a threshold of 3% infestation (3 mites / 100 bees, or 9 mites in your ½ cup sample). This number may change over time, or by region. Make sure that you check with other beekeepers, extension, and tech transfer teams to learn current thresholds.

Continue to test the rest of the colonies in your yard. If you have only a few colonies, you will want to test all of them. If you have a lot of colonies, test at least 8 in each yard. Make sure that you are prepared with a plan if you find even one colony with high levels of mites. A high mite load in one colony can quickly spread to others.

Congratulations! You have just finished monitoring your honey bee colonies for the varroa mite, the first step in ensuring that your honey bee colonies are kept safe from this terrible pest. If your mite populations are below threshold, take good notes, and enjoy your day. If your mite populations are above threshold, make sure that you take action to protect your bees. For useful documents on what tools to use to manage the varroa mite, visit: https://pollinators.msu.edu/resources/beekeepers/managing-the-varroa-mite/

Sugar roll step-by-step

1. Gather all your materials

2. Find a frame of brood

3. Collect a ½ cup of worker bees from the brood into your jar

4. Add 2 tbsp powdered sugar to the bees in the jar

5. Roll the jar to coat the bees with sugar

6. Put the jar to rest in the shade for 2 minutes

7. Shake the mites out of the jar into a tub

8. Count the number of mites in your sample

9. Divide by 3 to get the number of mites / 100, and compare to your threshold

10. Feel good that you are helping keep your bees healthy!

©American Bee Journal. View All Articles.

Varroa Mite Monitoring—Using A Sugar Roll To Identify Populations Of Varroa Destructor In Honey Bee Colonies
https://americanbeejournal.mydigitalpublication.com/articles/varroa-mite-monitoring-using-a-sugar-roll-to-identify-populations-of-varroa-destructor-in-honey-bee-colonies

Menu
  • Page View
  • Contents View
  • Advertisers
  • Website
  • Contact Us

Issue List

April 2026 Vol 166 No 04

March 2026 Vol 166 No 3

February 2026 Vol 166 No 2

January 2026 Vol 166 No 1

December 2025 Vol 165 No 12

November 2025 Vol 165 No 11

October 2025 Vol 165 No 10

September 2025 Vol 165 No 9

August 2025 Vol 165 No 8

July 2025 Vol 165 No 07

June 2025 Vol 165 No 06

May 2025 Vol 165 No 05

April 2025 Vol 165 No 4

March 2025 Vol 165 No 03

February 2025 Vol 165 No 02

January 2025 Vol 165 No 1

December 2024 Vol. 164 No. 12

November 2024 Vol. 164 No. 11

October 2024 Vol. 164 No. 10

September 2024 Vol. 164 No. 9

August 2024 Vol 164 No 8

July 2024 Vol 164 No 7

June 2024 Vol. 164 No. 6

May 2024 Vol. 164 No. 5

April 2024 Vol. 164 No. 4

March 2024 Vol 164 No 3

February 2024 Vol 164 No 2

January 2024 Vol 164 No 1

December 2023 Vol. 163 No. 12

November 2023 Vol 163 No 11

October 2023 Vol. 163 No. 10

September 2023 Vol. 163 No. 9

August 2023 Vol 163 No 8

JULY 2023 Vol 163 No 7

June 2023 Vol 163 No 6

May 2023 Vol 163 No 5

April 2023 Vol. 163 No. 4

March 2023 Vol. 163 No. 3

February 2023 Vol 163 No 2

January 2023 Vol. 163 No. 1

December 2022 Vol. 162 No. 12

November 2022 Vol. 162 No. 11

October 2022 Vol. 162 No. 10

September 2022 Vol. 162 No. 9

August 2022 Vol. 162 No. 8

July 2022 Vol. 162 No. 7

June 2022 Vol 162 No 6

May 2022 Vol 162 No 5

April 2022 Vol. 162 No. 4

March 2022 Vol 162 No 3

February 2022 Vol. 162 No. 2

January 2022 Vol 162 No 1

December 2021 Vol. 161 No. 12

November 2021 Vol. 161 No. 11

October 2021 Vol. 161 No. 10

September 2021 Vol. 161 No. 9

August 2021 Vol. 161 No. 8

July 2021 Vol 161 No 7

June 2021 Vol. 161 No. 6

May 2021 Vol 161 No 5

April 2021 Vol 161 No 4

March 2021 Vol 161 No 3

February 2021 Vol. 161 No. 2

January 2021 Vol. 161 No. 1

December 2020 Vol. 160 No. 12

November 2020 Vol. 160 No. 11

October 2020 Vol 160 No 10

September 2020 Vol. 160 No. 9

August 2020 Vol 160 No 8

July 2020 Vol. 160 No. 7

June 2020 Vol. 160 No. 6

May 2020 Vol 160 No 5

April 2020 Vol. 160 No. 4

March 2020 Vol. 160 No. 3

February 2020 Vol. 160 No. 2

January 2020 Vol. 160 No. 1

December 2019 Vol. 159 No. 12

November 2019 Vol. 156 No. 11

October 2019 Vol. 159 No. 10

September 2019 Vol. 159 No. 9

August 2019 Vol. 159 No. 8

July 2019 Vol. 159 No. 7

June 2019 Vol. 159 No. 6

May 2019 Vol. 159 No. 5

April 2019 Vol. 159 No. 4

March 2019 Vol. 159 No. 3

February 2019 Vol. 159 No. 2

January 2019 Vol. 159 No. 1

December 2018 Vol. 158 No. 12

November 2018 Vol. 158 No. 11

October 2018 Vol. 158 No. 10

September 2018 Vol. 158 No. 09

August 2018 Vol. 158 No. 8

July 2018 Vol. 158 No. 7

June 2018 Vol. 158 No. 6

May 2018 Vol. 158 No. 5

April 2018 Vol. 158 No. 4

March 2018 Vol. 158 No. 3

February 2018 Vol. 158 NO. 2

January 2018 Vol 158 No 2

December 2017 Vol. 157 No. 12

November 2017 Vol. 157 No. 11

October 2017 Vol. 157 No. 10

September 2017 Vol 157 No 9

August 2017 Vol. 157 No. 8

July 2017 Vol. 157 No. 7

June 2017 Vol. 157 No. 6

May 2017 Vol. 157 No. 5

April 2017 Vol. 157 No. 4

March 2017 Vol. 157 No. 3

February 2017 Vol. 157 No. 2

January 2017 Vol. 157 No. 1

December 2016 Vol. 156 No. 12

November 2016 Vol. 156 No. 11

October 2016 Vol. 156 No. 10

September 2016 Vol 156 No 9

August 2016 Vol 156 No 8

July 2016 Vol. 156 No. 7

June 2016 Vol. 156 No. 6

May 2016 Vol. 156 No. 5

April 2016 Vol. 156 No. 4

March 2016 Vol. 156 No. 3

February 2016 Vol. 156 No. 2

January 2016 Vol. 156 No. 1

December 2015 Vol. 155 No 12

November 2015 Vol. 155 No. 11

October 2015 Vol. 155 No. 10

September 2015 Vol. 155 No. 9

August 2015 Vol. 155 No. 8

July 2015 Vol. 155 No. 7

June 2015 Vol. 155 No. 6

May 2015 Vol. 155 No. 5

April 2015 Vol. 155 No. 4

March 2015 Vol. 155 No. 3

February 2015 Vol. 155 No. 2

January 2015 Vol. 155 No. 1

December 2014 Vol. 154 No. 12

November 2014 Vol. 154 No. 11

October 2014 Vol. 154 No. 10

September 2014 Vol. 154 No. 9

August 2014 Vol. 154 No. 8

July 2014 Vol. 154 No. 7

June 2014 Vol 154 No 6

May 2014 Vol. 154 No. 5

April 2014 Vol. 154 No. 4

March 2014 Vol. 154 No. 3

February 2014 Vol. 154 No. 2

January 2014 Vol. 154 No. 1

December 2013 Vol. 153 No. 12

November 2013 Vol. 153 No. 11

October 2013 Vol. 153 No. 10

September 2013 Vol 153 No 9

August 2013 Vol. 153 No. 8

July 2013 Vol. 153 No. 7

June 2013 Vol. 153 No. 6

May 2013 Vol. 153 No. 5

April 2013 Vol. 153 No. 4

March 2013 Vol. 153 No. 3

February 2013 Vol. 153 No. 2

January 2013 Vol. 153 No. 1

December 2012 Vol. 152 No. 12

November 2012 Vol. 152 No. 11

October 2012 Vol. 152 No. 10

September 2012 Vol. 152 No. 9

August 2012 Vol. 152 No. 8

July 2012 Vol. 152 No. 7

June 2012 Vol. 152 No. 6

May 2012 Vol. 152 No. 5

April 2012 Vol. 152 No. 4

March 2012 Vol. 152 No. 3

February 2012 Vol. 152 No. 2

January 2012 Vol. 152 No. 1

November 2011 Vol. 151 No. 11

October 2011 Vol. 151 No. 10

September 2011 Vol. 151 No. 9

August 2011 Vol. 151 No. 8

July 2011 Vol. 151 No. 7

June 2011 Vol. 151 No. 6

May 2011 Vol. 151 No. 5

April 2011 Vol. 151 No. 4

March 2011 Vol. 151 No. 3

February 2011 Vol. 151 No. 2

January 2011 Vol. 151 No. 1

December 2010 Vol. 150 No. 12

November 2010 Vol. 150 No. 11

October 2010 Vol. 150 No. 10

September 2010 Vol. 150 No. 9

August 2010 Vol. 150 No. 8

July 2010 Vol. 150 No. 7

June 2010 Vol. 150 No. 6

May 2010 Vol. 150 No. 5

April 2010 Vol. 150 No. 4

March 2010 Vol. 150 No. 3

February 2010 Vol. 150 No. 2

January 2010 Vol 150 No 1

December 2009 Vol. 149 No. 12

November 2009 Vol. 149 No. 11

October 2009 Vol. 149 No. 10

September 2009 Vol. 149 No. 9

August 2009 Vol. 149 No. 8

July 2009 Vol. 149 No. 7

June 2009 Vol. 149 No. 6

April 2009 Vol. 149 No. 4

March 2009 Vol 149 No. 3

February 2009 Vol. 149 No. 2

January 2009 Vol 149 No. 1


Library